Alex Skene wrote: > On tonight's Newsnight, Sir Stuart Bell from the Member's Estimate > Committee said that it was MPs who did the redactions,
That is contradicted by e.g. the Gordon Brown section on http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8107922.stm Perhaps he meant it was the Members Estimates Committee (some MPs) who set the rules for redaction? That is what http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jun/18/mps-expenses-censorship-black-out seems to say. This all seems pretty fruitless to go on about, if the Telegraph are going to publish everything unredacted by Saturday, as http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5572160/Blackout-the-great-MPs-expenses-cover-up.html says: "Many of these will be made available on the Telegraph website". ATB, Matthew > and said that they were only meant to redact the 7 kinds of personal > information set out in the High Court judgement... > If there are any dodgy looking redactions, or missing receipts it > should now be possible to ask for their specific details via FOI... _______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
