Just to chip in, given Matthew's observation. I've had problems in the past with councils making a mess of items I've reported which turned out to be caused by them looking at the description of the location (and not going through to the map). A mistake by them, yes, but also an easily understandable mistake I think. I now often therefore type in the location so that I know for sure at least part of the information going to a council.
So I'd also find a change along the lines suggested very useful, Mark 2009/7/28 Matthew Somerville <[email protected]>: > 80n wrote: >> It's actually even worse than this. The user doesn't even have a clue >> that you might be telling the council something different from what the >> user actually submitted. > > We are not doing that, I'm not sure what makes you say that - we're > adding a bit of extra automatically generated information, clearly > marked as such. It was added in case someone couldn't access the map to > still provide information towards locating the report. > >> At the very minimum the user ought to be copied on the exact message >> sent to the council. > > I'll note your suggestion - you are however the first person ever to ask > for that. :) > > ATB, > Matthew > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list [email protected] > Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public > _______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
