will do. On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:42 +0100, "Timothy Green" <[email protected]> wrote: > Great start. To agree with Tom, I think a colour scheme of grey to green > might work better in terms of readability, green of course being "hot" > and grey "not". The grid is a bit distracting and doesn't seem to add > anything. > > As you seem to suggest, I think photos around the edge, pointing to > various diverse scenic areas would work - as are a few major towns and > perhaps national parks (though maybe the point of SON is more a focus on > town prettiness than wilderness?) > > -t > > Tom Steinberg wrote: > > If I could suggest priorities they would be: > > > > 1. Finding a slightly nicer basic colour scale, from 'hot' to 'not', > > and a complementary sea colour. This is the most important decision > > for making the graphic sing I think. Quite a dark colour for the sea > > would be best, I feel. > > > > 2. A nice big title along the top > > > > 3. Overlaid place names, but not so many it blots out the information > > the map contains. > > > > Once it has those basic things, it might be 'done', but if it isn't, > > those are the basis for working out what optional extras to add. > > > > Joe - is this something you could help with, given your ninja logo skills? > > > > best, > > > > Tom > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list [email protected] > Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
_______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
