>From what (little) I know of the Lewisham system, I suspect the motivation (rightly or wrongly) will have been the back-end admin.
I believe Lewisham's system was design to be very closely integrated with the systems the council / their contractors use both so that the whole process can be managed more efficiently and so the public can login to see exactly where the item has got to in the system. I think it's true to say that goes beyond what a council can do with FixMyStreet, but by all means put me right... Mark On 16 April 2010 09:16, Etienne Pollard <[email protected]> wrote: > Nick > How about putting in a Freedom of Information request to London Councils, > who funded the work: http://www.lovecleanstreets.org/Help/About links > to http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/capitalambition/default.htm > > Etienne > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 9:09 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> There is nothing like duplicating an existing system. >> >> My immediate question, is how much local government has spent on this. >> >> Nick >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list [email protected] >> Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: >> >> https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public > > > > -- > Etienne Pollard > [email protected] > Want to make politics more transparent? Donate £5/month to > TheyWorkForYou.com > Find out more at http://www.pledgebank.com/twfypatrons > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list [email protected] > Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: > https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public > _______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
