On 18 November 2010 14:52, Matthew Somerville <[email protected]> wrote: > > IANAL (and as you say on your blog, German law might well apply here too). I > see no reason why they'd be in the public domain, but I'd say your example > there could be covered by "Fair dealing with a work for the purpose of > criticism or review" (as long as there's a sufficient acknowledgement).
I've said something about the difference between German and English law on the point here: http://www.francisdavey.co.uk/2010/11/image-rights-england-v-germany-and.html (Matt seemed happy for me to blog about it, and this is a public list). -- Francis Davey _______________________________________________ Mailing list [email protected] Archive, settings, or unsubscribe: https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
