Ernst Bunders wrote:
> >
>
> but is it nessecary to do it through the query framework? Should it nog
> be included in the StorageManager?
Two aspects of the same thing ('database interaction'). Though you do
put your finger on the spot. Updating is done by the storage-manager
(only on a 'per node' basis), querying by the SearchQueries. For
updating you could need something very similar to a searchquery (like in
the example of Paul), so i'd say it must be two aspects of the same
thing, and to solve this, we must probably do something on both
areas. As said, I don't know how difficult that would be, but naively
I'd say: 'not very'.
Michiel
--
Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil'
Peperbus 111 MediaPark H'sum [] ()
+31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
