Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
Kees Jongenburger wrote:
I totally agree with nico about the session stuff and vague concepts.
I agree with that too...
I also agree with Michiel he is trying to make MMBase "perfect /
better", tha'ts nice but I don't think that's what will help MMBase to
grow or be used in different way's. Still it's good/great work and you
can't build a framework on top of a rotten core. Michiels proposals
are very important but are not concentrating on what the developer
want or what the user want :)
Yes, I think the MMBase core must become better in the next release. To
start with, it must become better than it is now. Preferrably it should
also be better than other products (though it's probably different so
hard to compare), but that's not the point here.
IOW , I still use MMBase for website work (mm:images,the generic
editors and the way MMBase does relations are the main resons). A nice
addition would be a framework that support the Strong points of MMBase
(no compile/deploy cycle). so more scripting, and simple MVC framework
where all components can be scripted. I should be fun and we should be
able to do AJAX and such stuff in a breeze or am I missing the point?
The next step in the 'datatypes' project will be about AJAX (used for
client side validation of user input), that could be a start for a
javascript library targeted at AJAX and MMBase.
For the server side of AJAX MMBase is already very fit, because it is
very very easy to produce XML's with MMBase date with a jsp(x).
hoi,
Michiel
If an AJAX project will be started, I would like to take part :-)
regards,
Ruud
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
