On May 11, 2006, at 7:58 PM, Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
Since 1.8.0 is out, we can now think about what we can do for upcoming
releases.
To be fair i think we should base what is needed/want. in 1.9 on
feedback
and commitments from users and big partners its all fine to again
point at
some part of the core and say 'its ugly lets replace it' but it might
not help
end users or partners.
My personal view is that the biggest area of interest should be aimed at
making the first steps to allow the upcoming framework who's aim is
to be
able to write components easer and share them easer (thats still the
core
reason we started MMBase).
So i see Michieal list as a very valid one since its clearly a
inbetween list
the adding of performance tests is one i like alot since its a area
where
mmbase is lacking alot. You can claim MMBase is slow but i personally
don't see what to base that on since well i haven't seen any performance
tests to make that claim. Dropping 1.4 support is also fine with me.
Changing the core i would only do if its clear that we don't have enough
work on the component/framework issue (and that will be moved to 2.0)
since
i feel having a framework that allows the sharing of components is
paramount
in the developemt of MMBase the coming year.
Daniel.
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
