Kees Jongenburger wrote: > I totally agree with nico about the session stuff and vague concepts.
I agree with that too... > I also agree with Michiel he is trying to make MMBase "perfect / > better", tha'ts nice but I don't think that's what will help MMBase to > grow or be used in different way's. Still it's good/great work and you > can't build a framework on top of a rotten core. Michiels proposals > are very important but are not concentrating on what the developer > want or what the user want :) Yes, I think the MMBase core must become better in the next release. To start with, it must become better than it is now. Preferrably it should also be better than other products (though it's probably different so hard to compare), but that's not the point here. > IOW , I still use MMBase for website work (mm:images,the generic > editors and the way MMBase does relations are the main resons). A nice > addition would be a framework that support the Strong points of MMBase > (no compile/deploy cycle). so more scripting, and simple MVC framework > where all components can be scripted. I should be fun and we should be > able to do AJAX and such stuff in a breeze or am I missing the point? The next step in the 'datatypes' project will be about AJAX (used for client side validation of user input), that could be a start for a javascript library targeted at AJAX and MMBase. For the server side of AJAX MMBase is already very fit, because it is very very easy to produce XML's with MMBase date with a jsp(x). hoi, Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen mihxil' Peperbus 111 MediaPark H'sum [] () +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US _______________________________________________ Developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
