Op 25-mei-2006, om 21:24 heeft Daniel Ockeloen het volgende geschreven:

reposted it myself since i made even more language mistakes the normal sorry :)
-------------

Now your proposal's main point is we might not be able to share frameworksn based on these 2 models and we might not even implement the components made for these frameworks in the same way but by adding a few interface concepts we can atleast demand they are shareable and if we make them configurable very useable in all the frameworks.

Is this a fair view ?

No, i don't think so. Yes, we aim to be able to develop components which as well can be used as portlets or just jsp snippets of code in templates. But no, it is not ment to exclude 'ways' of developings websites. It aims at being a framework that can be used in several mmbase repository, cms implementations or frameworks: leo cms, kennisnet, patmos, just jps templates, you name it.

---André



Daniel.
_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers


--
André van Toly
web http://www.toly.nl                            mobile +31(0)627233562
------------------------------------------------------------------>><<--

_______________________________________________
Developers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mmbase.org/mailman/listinfo/developers

Reply via email to