Rico Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do support the idea of extensible functions, however the biggest > problem I see is the lack of detail about the function of current > functions (part of it has already been broken inadvertly).
If functionality got broken accidentily yet, then that was er an accident.. Please complain or mark it as a bug. > Also the actual mechanism is not entirely clear, for instance is it > global, or just working on the bridge ? It is global, but can of course use bridge objects. > I also think it is too close to the code freeze , but that is personal. If I might add, the taglib is in this respect now has dangling ends (function-tags make no sense if you don't know how to check parameters) and I'd postpone the freeze and the release if I don't know how to implement this. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediapark C101 Hilversum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
