On Nov 27, 2003, at 11:23 AM, Rob van Maris wrote:
[X] org.mmbase.functions [ ] org.mmbase.bridge.functions [ ] org.mmbase.core.functions [ ] org.mmbase.module.core.functions [ ] something else:
START OF CALL: 2003-11-24 END OF CALL: 2003-11-27
[_] +1 (YES) [_] +0 (ABSTAIN ) [X] -1 (NO), because : [_] VETO, because:
I support the initiative, but as it stands no clear picture is provided
of what is actually proposed.
Basically you're asking for a carte-blanche, and that requires a project
instead of a hack-vote.
I'm willing to reconsider if a new proposal is made, outlining in more detail what modifications are proposed - e.g. at API level.
I am a bit confused by all this we proposed making small changes so we have room to add external applications that give us
room to test/try different solutions for adding functions. if people react to this vote it seems 'we want to see all effects of what this
means within the taglibs, how its implemented and could be implemented'. This makes this whole hack vote useless since its forced
into a project (with effects in taglibs, core, editors, xml's, reflections and a whole range of other places).
I can only speak for myself i will (and submarine) keep making new products based on functions and this means using a non standard
mmbase at its core (infact i need to remove 2 lines in the core to make it work). Whatever happens i like to thank michiel for trying to add
a few hooks without turning it into a new large project that we clearly for the lack of developers can't handle.
Daniel.
