Michiel Meeuwissen wrote:
Daniel proposes an implementaiton based on an XML, which simply states all
classes and methods which must be accessible, grouped by 'sets'.
Ok.
I don't actually understand this point. When using reflection to 'define' a
function, there might be more methods with the same name. The above
mentioned implementation simply gives an error if there is more than one
with the given name.
But probably that is not what you meant?
What I actually meant is nesting, will that be supported ?
Like html(substring(field,0,5)).
--
Rico Jansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
"You call it untidy, I call it LRU ordered" -- Daniel Barlow