> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Kees Jongenburger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: donderdag 19 februari 2004 15:47 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: RE: JAI > > > <quote> > >b.t.w. on http://carlit.mine.nu/~mmbase/fom-serve/cache/21.html > >there is some info about why using png images in mmbase. > > > > > Very useful link. > One question, ofcourse, rises: > Why isn't this part of the mmbase documentation? > </quote> > Once upon a day I tried to concentrate on content (and not technique) > and if I would have concentrate on technique(docbook) I don't > think the content would be there. > > maybe i can store this in de kbase? >
I think this type of information, by which i mean a small topic, is especially sutable for the kbase, where the context of information is much better represented than the information itselfe. There are some questions i would like to pose though, before we start using the kbase and fill her up with a lot of sweet content: 1 Is the datamodel sufficient? can we use it for all that we would like to use it. Here i would like to say that i dont see it as a second version of the documentation. it should be complimentary. I can imagine though that the fact no images can be added is unacceptible? or maybe other people have different wishes? Of corse features (like searching) can later be added. Another thing: is it necesairy to be able to link to other parts of the kbase. I notice that Kees's knowledgebase has such a feature, but i find it a bit confusing myself.... 2 I noticed that of late the structuring of the documentation hes gone through a lot of changes. Allso i do not allways understand wat version to expect on www.mmbase.org/documentation/ How can we link from kbase articles to documentation in a way that will work in the future? 3 are we going to desingn an information structure, or are we juse gonna let it grow? what's the thought? > > > > > >
