Ernst Bunders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ok, i quess i am reacting from a feeling that all kinds of functionality is > being added to the mmbae packages only becouse it is needed for some > specific situation or without a real overall concept of what should be in > the mmbase packages. I have nothing against a bridge.util package, but a lot > of little things are being added here and there and where's the time to > document it all? I quess i would like to see less better documented and more > accessible features, but i admit this is a very general idear that was > triggered by your specific request.
If you think that my proposal was not documented well enough, you should have said that. Though I think the javadoc of the proposed class was quite ok. I would not know what more documetnation would be needed. For these kind of 'utils' javadoc which the right cross references should be enough, as it is enough for java.util-classes. I for me, would like a nice library of 'bridge utils' where I could find these kind of things. Michiel -- Michiel Meeuwissen Mediacentrum 140 H'sum +31 (0)35 6772979 nl_NL eo_XX en_US mihxil' [] ()
