On quinta-feira, 2 de agosto de 2012 15.23.06, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote: > On 2 August 2012 15:15, Dmytro Poplavskiy <dmytro.poplavs...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's possible to use LGPL Qt in the commercial products, > > it's only necessary to open changes done to the Qt itself if any. > > I will try to be more specific with my question :) > > What kind of license is using RIM for their Cascades UI? It's based on > Qt/QML, but as fra as I know they are submitting patches upstream > (please correct me if I'm wrong).
LGPL.
> What kind of license is using Jolla, for example?
LGPL.
> What I'm trying to understand is if there are any possible
> restrictions or problems using Qt for a mobile products both if Nokia
> is keeping Qt alive, or if they just abandon it or if they sell it or
> whatever....
No, there aren't. Not from Qt's perspective, anyway.
There's only a problem if the user / customer does not accept code under the
LGPL. There are many companies that are like that, including entire industry
sectors.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
