On quinta-feira, 11 de outubro de 2012 17.46.11, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > The other thing is, we still need to rename the libraries. Otherwise, we > > can't install both sets of *.so files to /usr/lib. > > that's simply not a relevant concern. production libraries can be > co-installed just fine. and development libraries can live in their > respective subfolders and be found via the respective -L options (which > come out of pkg-config - which is why i'm considering making the .pc > files co-installable out of the box).
I'd simply version the libraries. We already do that on Windows too, for example. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development