On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:54:28AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > I'd simply version the libraries. > yes. me too. i wouldn't rename them, though. ;)
> We already do that on Windows too, for example. > only because windows has no built-in support for versioning dlls. and fwiw, what qmake does is an utter hack which causes trouble on a regular basis. your whole argument is built on the premise that the system-provided versioning is broken enough that we should ignore it and just claim that different major versions are different libraries alltogether. i disagree with this premise. and i dislike what consequences it has for everything else which is not a library, and the effect it has on *me*, a qt developer. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
