04.09.2013 09:36, Olivier Goffart пишет: > > It is unfortunate that the standard did not choose the name > std::scoped_pointer, but that's not the first time the standard and Qt are > using different name (QByteArray <> std::string, QLinkedList <> std::list, > ...)
I think, there is a real reason to name it as unique_ptr (unique ownership vs. shared ownership). And there is no need 'scoped_ptr' because 'const unique_ptr' is that you need as scoped_ptr. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
