On 20/02/14 10:05, "Heikkinen Jani" <[email protected]> wrote:
>What I have discussed here the process has been to move stuff to the >archive when new minor release is done. From that point of view archive >is almost up to date, only 5.1.1 is missing. > >But it is also OK to put stuff to the archive when new release comes out >if that is the wanted behavior. > >If I understood correctly the new "process" would be: > >- http://download.qt-project.org/official_releases/qt/ would have only >latest releases( currently 5.2.1 & 4.8.5) > >- http://download.qt-project.org/archive/qt/ would have all releases >(including latest ones) > >If this OK for everyone I can easily update these folders. That sounds good to me. I’d say go ahead. Cheers, Lars > > >Br, >Jani > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf Of Matthew Woehlke >> Sent: 19. helmikuuta 2014 18:14 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the >> archives >> >> On 2014-02-19 10:33, Sze Howe Koh wrote: >> > What do you think of this arrangement?: >> > - When a packages are released, put them straight in the archive >> >> Yes, please. It drives people that need to reference source packages by >> URL (e.g. I bet this includes distro packagers) absolutely nuts to have >> the canonical URL for a package change when a new version comes out. >> >> -- >> Matthew >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >_______________________________________________ >Development mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
