I was thinking that as well and discussed about this with my colleagues. The only reason for this additional "official_releases" dir is that it will be short list of releases instead of quite long list in Archive -folder. That way it is easier for the users to find the latest one; they don't need to find correct one from that Archive mess. And as Sergio already proposed we can use symbolic links between between /official_releases/ and /archives/ so that we don't duplicate the packages on the server.
Br, Jani > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: 20. helmikuuta 2014 18:56 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the > archives > > Em qui 20 fev 2014, às 09:05:57, Heikkinen Jani escreveu: > > - http://download.qt-project.org/official_releases/qt/ would have only > > latest releases( currently 5.2.1 & 4.8.5) > > > > - http://download.qt-project.org/archive/qt/ would have all releases > > (including latest ones) > > Why do we need the official_releases dir if everything is in the archive? > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
