Em sex 21 fev 2014, às 07:25:46, Heikkinen Jani escreveu: > I was thinking that as well and discussed about this with my colleagues. The > only reason for this additional "official_releases" dir is that it will be > short list of releases instead of quite long list in Archive -folder. That > way it is easier for the users to find the latest one; they don't need to > find correct one from that Archive mess. And as Sergio already proposed we > can use symbolic links between between /official_releases/ and /archives/ > so that we don't duplicate the packages on the server.
Easier: Keep everything in archives and add a "latest" symlink to the latest. Every packager knows that "latest" might change. But they might be surprised that stuff in "official_releases" disappears after a while. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
