> On to my now standard question: Can you summarize the discussion so far into
> a proposal on what you want to change? Keep it as short as possible :) For
> example, I think it’s understood that (incremental) framework coping is fast
> - no need to go into details. On the other hand I think it’s important to
> make clear which parts of the current workflow we will leave behind.
Well, in fact. It is me who has proposed changes and pushing them to Gerrit.
Jake is my advocate here ;)
Please see post that summarized what we want (as you have previously requested,
but probably was lost in numerous other posts):
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-August/017867.html
FYI there are 3 new changes for 5.4 (instead for dev, requested by Oswald
Buddenhagen):
https://codereview.qt-project.org/92071
https://codereview.qt-project.org/92072
https://codereview.qt-project.org/92073
Regards,
--
Adam
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
