> On 12 Aug 2014, at 13:37, Adam Strzelecki <o...@java.pl> wrote: > >> On to my now standard question: Can you summarize the discussion so far into >> a proposal on what you want to change? Keep it as short as possible :) For >> example, I think it’s understood that (incremental) framework coping is fast >> - no need to go into details. On the other hand I think it’s important to >> make clear which parts of the current workflow we will leave behind. > > Well, in fact. It is me who has proposed changes and pushing them to Gerrit. > Jake is my advocate here ;) > > Please see post that summarized what we want (as you have previously > requested, but probably was lost in numerous other posts): > > > http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-August/017867.html
No, this is "phase I", which is fine. I'm asking about "phase II”, where we are discussing workflow changes. Morten _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
