On Tuesday 20 January 2015 10:04:51 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Tuesday 20 January 2015 18:59:46 Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > given that the problems specific to distros have been adequately solved > > > (even if you find that hacky - which it certainly is in case of badly > > > written build systems), i don't see why we should bother changing > > > anything at this point. > > > > In that case, nothing is going to change on our end either, I can live > > with > > that (though I don't like the situation, for the reasons explained above), > > but Thiago will not be happy. > > I will be happy with the renaming provided that: > - it is done by Qt itself, not by distros patching > - the documentation is updated to match > - Qt Creator adapts > > Anything short of that is a recipe for incompatibility somewhere.
And I agree with Thiago here. Whatever we do should be the documented right thing to do. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
