On Tuesday 20 January 2015 15:39:28 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: [snip] > but this is already the case, and has been since qt2. so that ship has > sailed. in fact, when rex was pushing for the qmake-qt5 scheme, the > debian (?) guys made clear that they'll keep their qmake5 (?) scheme > anyway - they must, for compat reasons.
No, we didn't. And I actually don't remember anyone saying so. What we *might* have said is keeping qmake tied to qt4, previous to qtchooser. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
