On Tuesday 20 January 2015 19:35:33 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:04:51AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 January 2015 18:59:46 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > > given that the problems specific to distros have been adequately
> > > > solved (even if you find that hacky - which it certainly is in
> > > > case of badly written build systems), i don't see why we should
> > > > bother changing anything at this point.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In that case, nothing is going to change on our end either, I can
> > > live with that (though I don't like the situation, for the reasons
> > > explained above), but Thiago will not be happy.
> >
> >
> >
> > I will be happy with the renaming provided that:
> kevin meant that you would be unhappy with deprecating qtchooser as far
> as distros are concerned, and staying with the status quo (i.e., distros
> provide renamed aliases).
I would be happy to deprecate its requirement from distros, if my requirements
above are met.
I like it for my own uses because it allows me to type:
qmake -qt5-release
instead of
../../bin/qmake
or
../../../qtbase/bin/qmake
or
~/obj/qt/qt5-release/qtbase/bin
But I might replace it with a very simple shell script or function instead, if
it's not required by distros.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
