On Tuesday 20 January 2015 16:01:59 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Tuesday 20 January 2015 15:39:28 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > [snip] > > > but this is already the case, and has been since qt2. so that ship has > > sailed. in fact, when rex was pushing for the qmake-qt5 scheme, the > > debian (?) guys made clear that they'll keep their qmake5 (?) scheme > > anyway - they must, for compat reasons. > > No, we didn't. And I actually don't remember anyone saying so. > > What we *might* have said is keeping qmake tied to qt4, previous to > qtchooser.
I think we had a proposal to name qmake "qmake5" from upstream -- after my initial idea of calling it "qmake3" was shot down[1]. But since we also discarded the idea of renaming, there was no qmake5. [1] $ qmake -v QMake version 3.0 Using Qt version 5.4.1 in /home/thiago/obj/qt/qt5/qtbase/lib -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
