On 13 Apr 2015, at 14:50, Jeremy Lainé <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/13/2015 01:21 PM, Nurmi J-P wrote: >> Thanks for the ideas, keep it coming! :) We should probably follow the >> guidelines: https://wiki.qt.io/Creating_a_new_module_or_tool_for_Qt > > > How about just "android-controls", which would become > "qt-android-controls" if the project graduates from playground? I like this suggestion. In the end we will have much more (*) than just UI controls, though. Does that matter from the naming perspective? *) For example, good background service integration is important for my own use cases. Pretty much the same way WorkerScript works, I hope to be able to send arbitrary jsobjects between background services and UI instances. -- J-P Nurmi _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
