On 04/13/2015 03:46 PM, Nurmi J-P wrote: > On 13 Apr 2015, at 14:50, Jeremy Lainé <[email protected]> wrote: > >> How about just "android-controls", which would become >> "qt-android-controls" if the project graduates from playground? > I like this suggestion. In the end we will have much more (*) than just UI > controls, though. Does that matter from the naming perspective? > > *) For example, good background service integration is important for my own > use cases. Pretty much the same way WorkerScript works, I hope to be able to > send arbitrary jsobjects between background services and UI instances.
Another option is "quick-android", which would become "qt-quick-android". Cheers, Jeremy _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
