> On 14 Apr 2015, at 18:14, Jeremy Lainé <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 04/13/2015 03:46 PM, Nurmi J-P wrote: >> On 13 Apr 2015, at 14:50, Jeremy Lainé <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> How about just "android-controls", which would become >>> "qt-android-controls" if the project graduates from playground? >> I like this suggestion. In the end we will have much more (*) than just UI >> controls, though. Does that matter from the naming perspective? >> >> *) For example, good background service integration is important for my own >> use cases. Pretty much the same way WorkerScript works, I hope to be able to >> send arbitrary jsobjects between background services and UI instances. > > Another option is "quick-android", which would become "qt-quick-android”.
I’d like to avoid the “quick" word, because this is incompatible with Qt Quick. -- J-P Nurmi _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
