IANAL but using "for Android" should be fine w both Google and Qt (just stick the TM notice in your docs). I'm leaning towards Controls for Android (or, maybe QML for Android). It can still have a name of it's own (pick your favorite dog name or noun), but a descriptive name would IMO go a long way to understand what this is about, especially as it can be confusing as to how it relates to other Qt modules and technologies.
Best regards, Attila Csipa On 4/13/2015 3:58 PM, Nurmi J-P wrote: >> On 13 Apr 2015, at 14:13, Harri Pasanen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Name candidates: QML-Droid or QDroid > Various derivatives from Droid seem to be popular. Does it not fall to the > “any play on names” or “slang in names” categories? > > http://wiki.qt.io/Creating_a_new_module_or_tool_for_Qt > >> Btw, can QML do layouting of Android widgets, or is that left for the >> android layout engine? > So far I have just exposed the Android layouts, but implementing anchors is > on the wishlist. That would make Qt Quick developers feel at home. Android’s > RelativeLayout does not quite feel the same. > > -- > J-P Nurmi > > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
