On 20/01/29 10:39, ekke wrote: > Am 29.01.20 um 09:57 schrieb Cristián Maureira-Fredes: > > .... > > I really want to believe that the new startup price is the beginning > > of having ad-hoc pricing for everyone, and hopefully in the future > > we can also see "medium-size company prices" or > > "freelancer developer licenses", but such decisions cannot be made > > at the same time. > > > > Once the new startup pricing is out, the company will analyze if it was > > a good move, and evaluate special future offerings, > > the new pricing will only fit to very very small business or single > developers, so I imagine that there won't be so many licenses sold. > analyzing this one year later could give the answer "it doesn't work - let > us stop it". > > would be much better to change the limitations (increase max revenue) to get > a larger amount of new devs using this > > also it would be a good idea to have license prices for medium sized > businesses, so everyone starting with small-biz-license knows what to pay if > he/she has success and grows with Qt. > > I know some features are missing, but over all Qt is such a great platform > for mobile apps. Since QQC2 you can create cool and performant mobile apps. > (Looking forward to Qt6/QML3 where all is compiled to C++) > > I'm speaking on dev conferences, demonstrating apps at conferences and > customers, writing articles for magazines. Licensing costs always was the > barrier for other devs to jump on Qt. Now with $499/year it's much better to > argument against usw of Xamarin, Flutter, ReactNative.... > > Hope TQC will adjust definition of small business and also provide license > for medium business.
Again, a full +1 from my side on this. ekke is hitting just the right spot here. And I also think the minimal license should be 300US$/year. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development