At least contributions are fewer this year. I would not say it's dead, but
there has never been the vitality we'd hope if there was finally an
infrastructure here[?]

Loking at WURFL that is completely dead. The last version of even its API
(visible on MavenCentral) was
net.sourceforge.wurfl
<http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3A%22net.sourceforge.wurfl%22>
wurfl <http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Ca%3A%22wurfl%22>1.3.1.1
<http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Cnet.sourceforge.wurfl%7Cwurfl%7C1.3.1.1%7Cjar>
  all (12)
<http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22net.sourceforge.wurfl%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wurfl%22>
24-Aug-*2011*

I expect to meet people interested in DeviceMap this weekend at the
MeetUp...

 Werner

On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Reza <[email protected]>
wrote:

> is ODDR dead? If it is, thats a large setback for this project (and their
> users)...
>
> This is why I have been pushing for this project to collect and maintain
> its own device data set. The data core to this effort. I wish I could
> devote more time to building the infrastructure for this... but I dont have
> the bandwidth at the moment. I can definitely help, but I cannot lead on
> this aspect.
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Werner Keil <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <
> [email protected]>; Reza <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 11:04 AM
> Subject: Re: DeviceMap Community - Incubator PMC/Board report
>
>
> Not quite monthly any more. I don't think there was a real big change, but
> after I did the last merge there was one new ODDR update.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Reza <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Do we have new device data? These updates are supposed to come monthly...
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Werner Keil <[email protected]>
> > To: "[email protected]" <
> > [email protected]>
> > Cc: Gopal Kris <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 10:33 AM
> > Subject: Re: DeviceMap Community - Incubator PMC/Board report
> >
> >
> > Gopal/all,
> >
> > This is the June report for DeviceMap. We skipped a month or two before
> > that, ideally we'd like to contribute to the next report, but the
> question
> > is, can we say anything substantial about the Device Data Service
> prototype
> > you said you have in the pipeline yet?
> >
> > I'll talk about DeviceMap this weekend (Sun) at a Web Developer MeetUp.
> > That was already mentioned, but if attendees or the organizer of this
> > meeting have clear intentions to contribute based on their dealing with
> the
> > project I'd add this before July 1 or 2. Nothing new from me other than
> > that.
> >
> > --------------------DeviceMapApache DeviceMap is a data repository
> > containing device information, imagesand other relevant information
> > for all sorts of mobile devices, e.g.smartphones and tablets. While
> > the focus is initially on that data, APIswill also be created to use
> > and manage it.DeviceMap has been incubating since 2012-01-03.Three
> > most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:  1.
> > Grow community.  2. Generate a release.  3. Explore options to allow
> > contributions through a Web based     interface/API to add new device
> > specs.  4. Improved support for additional languages/platform (.NET,
> > PHP,...)Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board
> > wish/need to beaware of?  (None)How has the community developed since
> > the last report?  Tangentially, there have been presentations at
> > conferences like JavaLand  raised awareness. A Mobile Development
> > MeetUp group in Germany is looking  into the code, and where they
> > might contribute.How has the project developed since the last report?
> > Syncing device data with OpenDDR in regular intervals when relevant
> > changes occur. Update of the Java DDR Simple API and other
> > libraries.Date of last release:  N/AWhen were the last committers or
> > PMC members elected?  N/A
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Werner
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Gopal Kris <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Web based interface to verify and add new device specs is what iam
> > working
> > > on.
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > > On 02-Jun-2014, at 10:40 pm, Werner Keil <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Spreading the word (as one of the few at the moment) is the best
> thing
> > > to do at the moment.
> > > > If contribution via a solid Web Service or Web Based interface can't
> be
> > > established here for DeviceMap, then I'm afraid, it's likely t fail.
> > > > And for that there's always a fall-back option to OpenDDR
> > > >
> > > > See attempts by Stephen Colebourne to create "Apache Commons Money"
> > > which failed quite miserably. So did his follow-up "JodaMoney", but he
> at
> > > least occasionally helped a bit with a new Java Standard in this area,
> > > JavaMoney.org (JSR 354). Sometimes it takes time and also exploring
> > > multiple options. Let's see which one is right here
> > > >
> > > > Werner
> > > >
> > > >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Kevan Miller <
> [email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> Thanks for the info.
> > > >>
> > > >> There may be lots of technical reasons justifying DeviceMap as
> > project.
> > > >> From an ASF perspective, these are secondary. Primarily, the ASF
> will
> > > need
> > > >> to see a viable DeviceMap *community*.
> > > >>
> > > >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html is worth reading
> > > from
> > > >> time to time. And measuring where we think we are in meeting these
> > > criteria.
> > > >>
> > > >> --kevan
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Werner Keil <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > I'd say these are only 2 very good arguments for the existence
> (and
> > > >> > eventual graduation) of DeviceMap:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > >
> >
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/samsung/10869294/Samsung-launches-first-open-source-Tizen-smartphone.html?bcsi-ac-95bb4efa6a1646c8=229BB80200000503pehAqDaU4KXwMGaXAhZZ60bGqOWhAAAAAwUAADJVUQAIBwAAIQAAAON6AwA=
> > > >> > and
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > >
> >
> http://dashburst.com/mobile-devices-insanely-large-screens/?utm_content=bufferfa4e6&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Werner
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:08 AM, eberhard speer jr. <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > >> > > Hash: SHA1
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Hi,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > my 2 cents regarding growing the community :
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > In short :
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > This community is small and we see it getting smaller.
> > > >> > > There some very good reasons for this (see below).
> > > >> > > This will by it's nature always be a rather small specialized
> > > community.
> > > >> > > But the ability to identify a user-agent/device will remain a
> > > >> > > fundamental thing.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Bit Longer :
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > 1) The 'Frameworks' always had the edge : much closer to the
> > > >> > > web-developer. DDR is HTTP-headers, back-end-y, further...far
> away
> > > >> > > stuff and never really reached them.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > 2) "Device" is shifting. What is currently understood as a
> > "device",
> > > >> > > the smart-and not so-smart phones, tables, pads, phablets,...
> are
> > > >> > > becoming more generic. Instead of long lists of esoteric
> > properties,
> > > >> > > it's basically back to : OS/browser/rendering-engine.
> > > >> > > DDR was 'sexy' because 'mobile' was 'device'.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > 3) HTML5 : following what goes on on the WhatWg list and 'out
> > there'
> > > >> > > you see it becoming easier and easier to 'do mobile' -- the sexy
> > > >> > > stuff, no frameworks etc.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > *But* the need for other uses stays [traffic analyses] and much
> > more
> > > >> > > importantly : 'device' will shift : "the Internet of
> > > Things"...sounds
> > > >> > > very much like "devices" to me.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Maybe the community should congratulate 'mobile' as it graduates
> > > from
> > > >> > > 'device', and be ready to welcome in the next 'devices'.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > esjr
> > > >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > >> > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
> > > >> > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
> http://www.enigmail.net/
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJThnqJAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcRlkH/irsBE8rnMWdu2Lfqrh31IDx
> > > >> > > WH7xSTdUf6i3ZJeimcig7MaLQy1G/3FR/QrmSjjwNCGo73Gq5sss6YnRLuDxwB3m
> > > >> > > ZMphxb3EAV2SUsT037fnSiM+I6BFC86nWs78S6FTD9etySlT2TCjW9OUp3wwXcIB
> > > >> > > //hmfmCuQT2TueOouN/Hk+RCiV3WuFW0JJ0l+MmBlMX9YgHp5Q2IxtuWegVae/Bn
> > > >> > > 1jF0zKewHAgrk90K5zH6gS4S1wS1h8QFTRcfHgxhUPEkMVg+c8X8aTS9QkYFNVmY
> > > >> > > VX4PC4UshrsStHVOve9lbic948qTLxBbIw5PPOapl55BXJJ/lLvfcs3ODHulLW0=
> > > >> > > =qjoV
> > > >> > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to