> In addition I think there has been more devinfo members testing and > reporting success with these samba rpms then any other devinfo project to > date. That's what I thought. I completely went into this thinking that I had something goofy on my end. I stripped every reminate of Samba off my test machine and reinstalled the rpms and your fragments. Still no go... Whats funny is that the deeper that I got into the problem, the more I convinced myself that the machine script was the problem. The Samba logs kept pointing back to the portion of the add user script parameter that referenced the dmc-machine-account-create script.
You know, something strange that I found when I asked the devinfo person to send me his smb.conf was that he had two entries for the add user script. One that used the "e-smith" approach and a second that used the traditional samba approach (add user script = /usr/bin/adduser ......). Could you check your smb.conf file to verify that you have only one add user script entry? Incidentially, this brings up another issue that I discovered with the Samba fragments RPM. I think when Mitel builds the blade, they need to incorprate a script that cleans out the templates-custom dir tree for smb.conf, otherwise rogue fragments from an old install may creep in. This is especially true if you had an install like mine where I had went in and made up my own fragments. ;) I could be completely out in left field on this... Wouldn't be the first time... Thanks for having a look at this. Best regards, Greg -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
