On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 02:31:15AM -0000, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > I think at this time, as we await Mitel to issue their samba blade we > should hold firm. IIRC, Mitel was looking into rewriting the > machine-create script anyhow. Once we see what they release to devinfo > for testing (right?) we can then revisit this issue if problems are > encountered.
e-smith-samba-1.1.0-10 is now in my contrib area. I believe I have folded in the latest changes from Darrell, but have yet included not those under discussion from Greg (no sleight intended, just a status update). I have also added guards to some of the fragments. Please note, it conflicts with e-smith-base, so you need to use --force to install it. And you should move templates-custom/smb.conf out of the way to ensure you are testing the fragments from this RPM. > Whilst I've mentioned it, can someone from Mitel comment on your samba > blade status? > [...] Real soon now, assuming the changes to e-smith-samba settle down. Gordon -- Gordon Rowell [EMAIL PROTECTED] VP Engineering Network Server Solutions Group http://www.e-smith.com Mitel Networks Corporation http://www.mitel.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
