On Sun, 9 Dec 2001 03:28, Charlie Brady wrote: > > > I vote for ext3, it will greatly simplify the upgrade of exisiting > > > installations. > And that, I think, is the trump card.
It certainly makes the upgrade a lot easier to swallow... > > Likewise, but also for stability reasons. Since ext3 is built on top of > > an already rock solid file system (and fully backward compatible to boot) > > it seems to be the logical choice. XFS's big drawcard is supporting > > ACLs, but the stability issue is the most important. > I've seen patches that add ACL support to ext3, for both 2.2.x and 2.4.x > kernels. For 2.4, see http://www.moldybread.net/patch/kernel-2.4/. I'll > let you guess where the 2.2 patches can be found :-) Hmm... interesting... Mind you, I think we need to get ext3 going without ACL first... :-) -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
