On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 07:44, Charlie Brady wrote: > > Mitel wants us to look at EXT3 on 2.2.19-7.0.12. Let's make this happen > > first. > > Next, (if possible) let's start another development track with XFS on > > 2.2.19-7.0.12. > I'd be happy also for someone to look at EXT3 on 2.4.x. That will probably > be the quickest way to get something running, and will be perfectly > acceptable (even preferable) to some.
..and in the long run, more stable. If we want to stick closely to the standard RedHat kernel, should we stick with the RedHat 7.2 standard kernel? I'll have to check, but I believe it has ext3 support built in. In any case, now that the 2.5 tree is open, *hopefully* the 2.4 kernel series will have had most of the nasties fixed, and should be pretty stable... > The things that will break with a 2.4.x kernel are: > - Various special purpose IP masquerade modules If I've got it right, this is one of the real problems... AFAIK, there is no replacement for the ICQ masquerading module... and this is one thing I've been having trouble with on the 2.4.8 kernel running on my Mandrake system... -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives by mail and http://www.mail-archive.com/devinfo%40lists.e-smith.org
