>>>>> "AL" == Adrian Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AL> It seems like various people here would rather do away with
AL> KSKs. I'd like these people to address how data submission
AL> might be dealt with in lieu of public keyspace. How would
AL> in-freenet key indices work without KSKs? How would things
AL> like EOF be implemented if users aren't able to submit data
AL> under public keys bearing a particular prefix?
I think both of them could be handled by having a
public-write-private-read key type -- kind of like an SSK in reverse.
AL> Is getting rid of KSKs really worth having to rely on external
AL> services for collecting data?
I'd definitely say NOT until we've got some other mechanism in place.
~Mr. Bad
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mr. Bad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/
freenet:MSK@SSK@u1AntQcZ81Y4c2tJKd1M87cZvPoQAge/pigdog+journal//
"Statements like this give the impression that this article was
written by a madman in a drug induced rage" -- Ben Franklin
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
