On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:50:51AM +0100, Michael Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:25:18PM +0000, Adrian Lopez wrote:
> > It seems like various people here would rather do away with KSKs. I'd
> > like these people to address how data submission might be dealt with in
> > lieu of public keyspace. How would in-freenet key indices work without
> > KSKs? How would things like EOF be implemented if users aren't able to
> > submit data under public keys bearing a particular prefix?
>
> (I'm assuming I have the permission of the Freenet Government to discuss
> this subject. If not, please say so and I'll have myself executed
> immediately.)
Well, since whatever network the proposal you outline below is intended
for is very obviously not Freenet, I would recommend that you take the
discussion to a group regarding that network.
I mean, if you are going to assign one single node a task of taking care
of the list - then why do you want to go through Freenet at all, short of
maybe making sure that 90% of the people who want the list will not find
it (for the hundreth time: Freenet does not work by routing requests to
the data, it works by moving the data to where the requests are)?
<>
--
'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?'
'Here,' Montag touched his head.
'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded.
Oskar Sandberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
