On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 05:26:00PM -0700, Mr . Bad wrote:
> >>>>> "AL" == Adrian Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> AL> It seems like various people here would rather do away with
> AL> KSKs. I'd like these people to address how data submission
> AL> might be dealt with in lieu of public keyspace. How would
> AL> in-freenet key indices work without KSKs? How would things
> AL> like EOF be implemented if users aren't able to submit data
> AL> under public keys bearing a particular prefix?
>
> I think both of them could be handled by having a
> public-write-private-read key type -- kind of like an SSK in reverse.
This would not require an extra key-type, it would merely require that
people encrypt their submissions with a well-known public key (if they
don't bother, then it is their own loss).
Ian.
PGP signature
