On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 05:26:55PM -0700, Mr. Bad wrote:
> >>>>> "PT" == Peter Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> PT> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:25:18PM +0000, Adrian Lopez wrote:
> >> It seems like various people here would rather do away with
> >> KSKs. I'd like these people to address how data submission
> >> might be dealt with in lieu of public keyspace. How would
> >> in-freenet key indices work without KSKs? How would things like
> >> EOF be implemented if users aren't able to submit data under
> >> public keys bearing a particular prefix?
>
> PT> You would give out the private key of a SSK for submissions.
>
> Well, that wouldn't really help, actually, if you think about it,
> right? You could still do an HTL=1 attack on a well-known private key.
But it would be no worse then a KSK system and the poster is just
asking what would we use if we removed KSK's.
--
GCS d s+:-- a--- C++++ UL++++ P L+++ E W++ N- o K- w-- O- M
V- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP+++ t 5 X R+ tv-- b+ DI+ D++ G e- h! r-- y--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://retep.tripod.com
PGP signature
