> > I really don't like the wording 'lite' and 'standard'. IMHO 'standard'
> should be without Java and something
> > like 'complete' for the Java including part.
>
> I must debate this one.
I agree 100% with Sebastian. Calling the distribution with the JRE included
'Standard' will cause people to download that version unnecessarily, wasting
lots of bandwith in the process (the JRE is, what, ~5mb?). Why not Freenet
'stand alone' (or 'without Java') and 'with Java'? You could include some
instructional text a la 'If unsure, download the version with Java'.
Verbosity is our friend, here.
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
