> Windows installer with Java runtime (use this if you don't have Java)
I'd suggest "Windows installer with Java runtime (use this if you don't have
Java or you're not sure if you do)"
-Stefan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brandon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 1:10 AM
Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] Re: Windows distribution naming
>
> > >From a programmer's or power user's point of view, James and Sebastion
are
> > totally right.
> > But from a marketing/PR point of view, I argue that the 'Standard/Lite'
> > convention makes more sense.
> >
> > I'd appreciate a ruling from the project admins on this one.
>
> I don't think we need to label them with these glib labels at all.
>
> The download section currently says this:
> Windows
> Windows installer (best option)
> Zip file
>
> In the future it should say:
> Windows
> Windows installer with Java runtime (use this if you don't have Java)
> Windows installer without Java runtime (use this if you're upgrading)
> Zip file (doesn't include Java runtime)
>
> If programmers are argueing over the meanings of Standard, Lite, and
> Complete, then users are bound to be confused as to which version they
> want. So it's best to just eschew labels and tell them which one they
want.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Devl mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
