> >From a programmer's or power user's point of view, James and Sebastion are
> totally right.
> But from a marketing/PR point of view, I argue that the 'Standard/Lite'
> convention makes more sense.
>
> I'd appreciate a ruling from the project admins on this one.
I don't think we need to label them with these glib labels at all.
The download section currently says this:
Windows
Windows installer (best option)
Zip file
In the future it should say:
Windows
Windows installer with Java runtime (use this if you don't have Java)
Windows installer without Java runtime (use this if you're upgrading)
Zip file (doesn't include Java runtime)
If programmers are argueing over the meanings of Standard, Lite, and
Complete, then users are bound to be confused as to which version they
want. So it's best to just eschew labels and tell them which one they want.
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
