On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 06:10:06PM -0500, Brandon wrote:
>
> > >From a programmer's or power user's point of view, James and Sebastion are
> > totally right.
> > But from a marketing/PR point of view, I argue that the 'Standard/Lite'
> > convention makes more sense.
> >
> > I'd appreciate a ruling from the project admins on this one.
>
> I don't think we need to label them with these glib labels at all.
>
> The download section currently says this:
> Windows
> Windows installer (best option)
> Zip file
>
> In the future it should say:
> Windows
> Windows installer with Java runtime (use this if you don't have Java)
> Windows installer without Java runtime (use this if you're upgrading)
> Zip file (doesn't include Java runtime)
>
> If programmers are argueing over the meanings of Standard, Lite, and
> Complete, then users are bound to be confused as to which version they
> want. So it's best to just eschew labels and tell them which one they want.
Also include some pointer to how to determine if the JRE is installed.
PGP signature
