On Wednesday 23 July 2003 23:29, Menno Jonkers wrote: > I'm on Red Hat 9 too and I've had very similar problems until recently. > What fixed it for me was a clean upgrade to 5.2.1 (so a fresh > start-freenet.sh, freenet.conf; kept the store). This has a fix avoiding > the native possix threads (nptl) that's used in RH9 (see > LD_ASSUME_KERNEL in start-freenet.sh)
OK, I've replaced my start-freenet.sh with the latest one and re-applied my mods. What does this option actually do? What is the alternative to native posix threads? > and freenet.conf has some new options for the NIO stuff. > Default settings work ok for me. Also, I went > back to JVM 1.4.1_03. I'm currently running 1.4.2. I'll see if the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL option makes any different to stability. It would certainly be nice if it does. > O, and I'm using the native FEC libraries, even though others have > reported problems with them. They've been good to me. Native FEC libraries? What do you mean? I thought FEC was built into the node code. Regards. Gordan _______________________________________________ devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
