On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:52:30PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > This has been discussed before, but it feels right to raise the matter > again. > > I'd like to ask that FCP be updated to transparently handle splitfiles.
That would be something other than FCP. FCP is a simple stateless protocol.. something higher level would be useful, but even then, transparent splitfile support is dangerous because it uses massive resources - hence we don't transparently support splitfiles in fproxy. > > It makes absolutely no sense to require all clients to implement > splitfiles functionality. Surely the splitfiles standard is sufficiently > settled now that the burden can be taken off the client. > > How about it, guys? > > -- > Cheers > David -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
