On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Toad wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:52:30PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > > This has been discussed before, but it feels right to raise the matter > > again. > > > > I'd like to ask that FCP be updated to transparently handle splitfiles. > > That would be something other than FCP. FCP is a simple stateless > protocol.. something higher level would be useful, but even then, > transparent splitfile support is dangerous because it uses massive > resources - hence we don't transparently support splitfiles in fproxy.
It'd be better to move a lot of that, including FEC into a C library. Why C? Because every other language can then bind to it. That way we move the processing burden to the clients but don't force everyone to re-implement the wheel. --Dan
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
