On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 02:55:54PM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote: > On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Toad wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:52:30PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > > > This has been discussed before, but it feels right to raise the matter > > > again. > > > > > > I'd like to ask that FCP be updated to transparently handle splitfiles. > > > > That would be something other than FCP. FCP is a simple stateless > > protocol.. something higher level would be useful, but even then, > > transparent splitfile support is dangerous because it uses massive > > resources - hence we don't transparently support splitfiles in fproxy. > > It'd be better to move a lot of that, including FEC into a C library. > Why C? Because every other language can then bind to it. That way we > move the processing burden to the clients but don't force everyone to > re-implement the wheel.
Well, there are several C FCP libraries IIRC... > > --Dan > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
